(Platforms, FPSOs)
Dynamic loadings take many forms. Two parameters can characterize such loadings: Their magnitude and their frequency content. Dynamic loadings can be replaced by static loadings when their frequency content is low compared to the natural frequency of the structure on which they are applied. Some people will refer as quasi-static analysis or loadings to remind themselves that they are actually predicting the effect of dynamic loadings treated as static equivalent. Most environmental loads (winds, earthquake, wave, transportation) can be replaced by quasi-static equivalents.
Contents [ hide ]
When the frequency content of a dynamic loading and the natural frequencies of a structure are in the same range, then this approximation is no longer valid. This is the case for most machinery (compressors, pumps, engines, etc.) which produce loadings whose frequency content overlaps the natural frequencies of the structure on which they are mounted (platform, FPSO, etc.). In such a case, only a dynamic analysis will accurately predict the amplification of the response of the structure. Such loadings cannot be replaced by quasi-static equivalents.
What makes these analyses even more challenging is the fact that the machinery, its equipment and the mounting skid cannot be seen as black boxes. They will interact with the foundation, the platform or the FPSO and the only way to know the magnitude of this interaction is to conduct a structural dynamic analysis that includes the foundation. This is a critical consideration which when overlooked considerably reduces the reliability of the machine and might even cause safety concerns.
Figure 1: Resonance and vibration on offshore structures is a common problem |
Structural vibration occurs when dynamic forces generated by compressors, pumps, and engines cause the deck beams to vibrate. This vibration leads to piping failures, poor equipment reliability, and safety concerns. The vibration is due to the structure being mechanically resonant. The term “resonance” occurs when dynamic forces coincide with the natural frequencies of the supporting structure. At resonance, the forces are amplified up to 20 times, and cause deck beams to vibrate above safe operating limits.
Refer to Wood's (BETA Machinery Analysis) Training Tools module 1 (video)for a more detailed explanation of resonance.
Structural resonance problems are not limited to larger horsepower equipment. They also occur with smaller reciprocating pumps or compressors, as the examples presented below clearly illustrate. Structural resonance is best avoided by a properly conducted Structural Vibration and Dynamic Design Analysis
Structural resonance is a common problem, but avoidable. These and many other examples illustrate structural vibration and resonance problems and methods used to avoid structural vibration (contact Wood for details):
Figure 2: Field testing for vibration on skid and structural beams |
Figure 3: Evaluating storm loading is one example of a Quasi-Static Analysis. Courtesy Shell International Limited |
Static, Quasi-Static, and Structural Vibration (Dynamic) Analyses are recommended for offshore production facilities. Since these terms can be confusing, this section explains the differences and who should be involved in the evaluation.
Static Analysis focuses on evaluating stress and buckling of members under constant loads. Constant loads can also be described as loads applied at a frequency of 0 Hertz (Hz). This type of analysis can also focus on deflection of skid members as they can affect alignment of equipment.
Quasi-Static Analysis evaluates the effects of loads that are periodic, but at a low enough frequency relative to the natural frequencies of the equipment package so that the inertia effects of the structure do not come into play. They tend to have a frequency of less than 3 cycles per second or 3 Hz.
Structural Vibration (Dynamic) Analysis predicts the dynamic effects of the machinery itself so that resonance can be avoided. Dynamic loads include imbalance, misalignment, pulsation forces, cross-head guide forces, cylinder gas forces, moments, and other forces (see Figure 5 for an example of dynamic forces in a reciprocating compressor). The machinery related loads occur across different frequency bands and can cause localized structural resonance.
Structural Dynamic Analysis focuses on evaluating vibration levels and stress. Limiting vibrations of structural members is important to control vibration of the equipment, vessels, and piping that are attached to it. If a skid member has high vibrations then these components will likely experience high vibrations also.
The applicable load frequency ranges and the associated design criteria for these three types of analysis are presented in Figure 4 and Table 1 (below).
Figure 4: Design criteria for static, quasi-static, dynamic analysis |
Table 1: Comparison of Structural Design Studies | ||
---|---|---|
Static Analysis | Quasi-Static Analysis | Vibration (Dynamic) Analysis |
Loads:
|
Loads:
|
Loads – Example from a reciprocating compressor (other loads occur in pumps):
|
One common industry approach is to increase the size and location of the deck beams. This approach can add significant construction costs and weight to the facility – beyond what is practical. It is also provides no guarantee that resonance will be avoided.
The recommended approach for dynamic analysis is to prepare an accurate Finite Element (FE) model of the dynamic load, skid, and affected structural members. Over the years, Wood has developed a number of specialized techniques to ensure accurate FE models. The approved model, combined with the dynamic forces, is used to identify local resonances and evaluate possible solutions.
Designing the structural steel supports for a compressor or pump package must balance stiffness, mass, and cost. High stiffness will help avoid vibration problems, but excessive use of over-sized beams will affect the mass and cost. An optimized design identifies where steel can be added or removed at key locations to maximize the stiffness and minimize the costs. This optimized approach will provide significant cost savings to the owner – far in excess of the cost of the engineering time.
During the design process, the structural engineers will conduct the Static Analysis. A specialist in Dynamic Analysis, such as Wood, conducts the Structural Vibration Analysis because it is integrated with the Dynamic Skid Analysis, and the dynamic modeling of compressor/pump systems.
There are many reasons why a specialist vibration/dynamic engineering company (such as Wood) is mandated to complete the Structural Dynamic Analysis:
Costly problems have occurred when a simplified approach is used for Structural Dynamic Analysis. Based on numerous field experiences, Wood has developed an accurate and cost-effective approach for new or brownfield offshore projects.
Structural resonance is a common problem on offshore production facilities that causes vibration related failures on piping and machinery systems.
Once the facility is built, it is very expensive to modify the structural deck beams to fix a vibration problem. A better approach is to conduct a Structural Vibration Analysis of specific areas of the deck or platform. During the design phase it is easy to make minor changes to the beam orientation and design to avoid resonance. This dynamic analysis is coordinated with the vibration design of large reciprocating and rotating equipment.
Structural Vibration (Dynamic) Analysis should not be confused with Quasi-Static Analysis of wave and wind loads. This is a separate analysis that is integrated with other dynamic studies (skids, and pump or compressor packages).
Wood's vibration, dynamics and noise team (formerly BETA Machinery Analysis) has decades of experience in conducting the dynamic and vibration studies for production facilities and is the global leader in these engineering design and field services.
Figure 5: Common Reciprocating Compressor Dynamic Forces |
For more information or to talk to us about a project or operational issue, email your questions to info.vdn@woodplc.com.
Tips for Managing a Successful Vibration Project • Example: Offshore Pump Package (Video) • Structural Vibration from Compressor (Example) (Video) •
Understand the top three vibration threats in your piping system and how to tame them. Register now