for all machinery types and applications
Small-bore connections, also called branch connections, to the main process piping represent the most common vibration problem on rotating and reciprocating machinery and associated process piping.
Small-bore connection design assessment and field vibration testing are strongly recommended to avoid piping integrity risks.
Contents [ hide ]
Field audit of small-bore connections | Cracked vessel due to SBC (blind flange) |
Piping vibration and fatigue can account for up to 20% of hydrocarbon releases; and a large portion of those are due to failure of small-bore connections per Energy Institute, 2008, Guidelines for the avoidance of vibration-induced fatigue failure, (AVIFF). Hydrocarbon emissions can lead to fire, explosions, injuries, property and environmental damage, and penalties.
A small-bore connection (SBC) is generally defined as a branched connection on mainline piping that has a nominal diameter 2” (DN 50) and smaller, including connections that have a branch pipe to mainline pipe ratio of less than 10%, and excluding connections that have a ratio of greater than 25% (see Figure below). Note that “mainline piping” could also describe equipment like a vessel or cooler to which the SBC is attached.
Small-bore piping (SBP) is defined as the piping attached to the small-bore connection, extending until the effect of the mainline piping vibration is negligible (typically, the nearest support or brace), as shown in the illustration below.
Multichannel systems used to assess SBC vibration risks |
SBCs are highly susceptible to problems due to their geometry and mass. Even very low amplitude (and acceptable) vibration on the main process piping can cause the branch connections to vibrate excessively and break due to fatigue failure. This is due to the local resonance of the SBC (see our Training video, Module 1 for examples of resonance). At certain frequencies, base vibration can be amplified by 20 to 30 times, causing branch connections to fail.
The consequences of a vibration-induced failure can be catastrophic. A small crack will release process fluids causing safety risks (explosion, fire, or toxic chemicals), environmental risk to the nearby area, and production downtime. In recent cases, SBC failures have been responsible for the shutdown of a pipeline and production facilities for weeks. Given the risk of these piping failures, owners must take an active role in avoiding them.
To address SBC integrity risks, the owner must specify the appropriate engineering assessment. Ideally, the evaluation occurs in three stages, as shown in the table below.
SBC assessment activities | |
---|---|
FEED/planning Defines the appropriate scope and requirements for dynamic design |
Screening Assessment of Piping System: Pulsations, Flow Turbulence, Acoustic-Induced, Mechanical excitations, Surge, Other Transient Events |
Detailed design Review and evaluate SBC designs |
SBC Analysis: Quantitative Approach, Identify Fatigue Risks, Finite Element (if required), Recommend Modifications |
Commissioning/operations Onsite testing, documentation, modifications (steady state and transient flow evaluations) |
SBC Vibration Assessment (Baseline): Steady State Conditions, Transient Operations, Extrapolate Results to Other Operating Conditions |
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is used to calculate stress and confirm acceptance (or failure) of small-bore piping design |
Qualified dynamic engineering experts are required to perform this work because it involves stress analysis, fatigue failure analysis, FEA, and other advanced dynamic analyses.
Warning: One common misconception is that a SBC assessment is similar to a standard vibration monitoring program such as condition based monitoring or route bases vibration check, which is often performed by vibration technicians. While this program is useful for monitoring degradation in bearings, it is not applicable to SBC engineering design and evaluation.
The scope of the SBC assessment will vary based on the application (liquid, gas or multiphase), operating frequency, location, and process conditions. These variables will affect the type of analysis conducted at site.
The following standard services are available for address SBC piping integrity risks. Contact Wood for more information on the detailed scope, or if a customized solution is required.
New projects (or modified systems) - includes design and field activities | |||
---|---|---|---|
Service | Description | Summary | Remaining risks |
SBC-D1 | Design SBC Review |
Basic approach: review available drawings and provide “best practice” recommendations. No field measurements. |
Medium Many remaining risks since resonance is possible (and no field verification/testing) |
SBC-D2 |
Standard SBC Integrity Assessment |
Design evaluation of proposed SBC with recommended changes. |
Low Common risks are significantly addressed. A small amount of residual risk remains. |
SBC-D3 |
Comprehensive SBC Integrity Assurance |
Wood is directly involved in SBC design to ensure a safe system that avoids resonances at key frequencies. |
Minimal Maximum assurance for the designed operating system. |
Existing operations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Service | Description | Summary | Remaining Risks |
SBC-F1 |
Standard SBC Field Assessment |
Ideal for evaluating SBC integrity and the associated piping on the machine system. Includes impact testing for MNFs, vibration screening, speed sweep, and detailed FEA (if required) to resolve problem locations. |
Low For standard service, there are practical limits to testing all locations. Not all operating conditions checked. Plant piping (off-skid) SBCs not evaluated. |
SBC-F2 |
Comprehensive SBC Integrity Audit |
For critical applications where more stringent testing is required. Includes transient and steady state testing, fatigue analysis, and assessment of pipe strain. Can include station piping (away from the rotating/reciprocating machine). |
Minimal Common risks are significantly addressed. A small amount of residual risk remains. |
To mitigate this risk, the owner (or its Engineering Consultant) must specify a SBC vibration study.
Webinar: Shake, rattle and grow (2022 update) • Webinar: Vibration problem solving – back to basics • Webinar: Controlling dynamic flexibility • Webinar: Piping and tubing vibration anomaly mgmt • Multi-channel vibration measurements • Five simple methods to check reciprocating compressor performance • Webinar: Feeling the pulse • Vibration-induced fatigue management (Offshore Magazine) • Webinar: Shake, rattle and grow I (2022 update) • Avoiding vibration-induced fatigue failure • Design Requirements for Reciprocating Compressors • Examples of Piping Vibration (Video) • Evaluating Compressor Operating Risks • Pipe Support Stiffness, GMRC Project • Transient Conditions on Small-Bore Piping • Piping Vibration Design Considerations • Tips for Managing a Successful Vibration Project • Piping Vibration Examples • An Integrated Approach to Manage Vibration Risks •
Understand the top three vibration threats in your piping system and how to tame them. Register now